Improve discoverability: event-sourcing positioning, ecosystem links, and package keywords - #166
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
PackageTags(event-sourcing, event-modeling, cqrs, dsl, compiler; dotnet-tool for the CLI).keywordsarrays so the npm package and the VS Code Marketplace listing surface in event-sourcing / CQRS / DSL searches.Note: the README's emoji headings are valid UTF-8 (verified byte-level) — no glyph fixes were needed.
Why
Screenplay never mentioned the category terms people actually search for (event sourcing, CQRS, event modeling), and its packages shipped without tags or keywords. This aligns the repository with the wording used across the Cratis organization: accurate breadth, consistent ecosystem cross-links, and category keywords on every published surface — no functional changes.